Up: The Past, Present, and Previous: Acknowledgment

References

AAUP (American Association of University Professors). 1991. The Annual Report on the Economic Status of the Profession 1990-91. Academe 77 March-April Special Issue, 9-91.

Ahern, N. E and Scott, E. L. 1981. Career Outcomes in a Matched Sample of Men and Women Ph.D.'s: An Analytical Report. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

Bayer, A. E. and Astin, 11. S. 1975. Sex differentials in the academic reward system. Science 188, 796-802.

Berg, 11. M. and Ferber, M. A. 1983. Men and women graduate students: Who succeeds and why? J. Higher Educ. 54, 629-647.

Billard, L. 1989. The past, present and future of women in Academia Proc. Amer. Statist. Assoc. Sesquicentennial Invited Paper Sessions, 645-656.

Billard, L., Cooper, T R. and Kaluba, J. A. 1990. A statistical adjustment to gender and race based salary inequalities. Technical Report.

CEEWISE (Committee on the Education and Employment of Women in Science and Engineering). 1983. Climbing the Ladder: An Update on the Status of Doctoral women Scientists and Engineers. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

Chipman, S. E and Thomas, V. G. 1985. Women's participation in mathematics: Outlining the problem. In Women and Mathematics: Balancing the Equation (eds. S. E Chipman, L. R. Brush and D. M. Wilson). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey.

Cole, J. R. 1979. Fair Science: Women in the Scientific Community. Free Press, New York.

Cole, J. R. and Zuckerman, H. 1984. The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in the patterns and publications of men and women scientists. In Advances in Motivation and Achievement (eds. P. Maehr and M. W. Steinkamp). JAI Press, Connecticut.

Davis, D. and Astin, Il. S. 1987. Reputational standing in academe. J. Higher Educ. 58, 261-275.

Deaux, K. and Emswiller, T 1974. Explanations of successful performance on sex-linked tasks: What is skill for the male is luck for the female. J. Personality and Social Psych. 29, 80-85.

Deaux, K. and Taynor, J. 1973. Evaluation of male and female ability: Bias works two ways. Psych. Reports 31, 2-31.

Debold, W K. 1987. Women in engineering and science: An undergraduate research perspective. In Women: Their Underrepresentation and Career Differentials in Science and Engineering (eds. L. S. Dir). National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

Dix, L. S. 1987. Women: Their Underrepresentation and Career Differentials in Science and Engineering, (ed.). National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

Ferber, M. A. 1986. Citations: Are they an objective measure of scholarly merit? Signs 11, 381-389.

Fidell, L. S. 1970. Empirical verification of sex discrimination in hiring practices in psychology. Amer. Psych. 25, 109-1098.

Goldberg, P A. 1968. Are women prejudiced against women? Transaction 5, 28-30.

Gray, M. W and Scott, E. L. 1980. A ``statistical'' remedy for statistically identified discrimination. Academe 66, 174-181.

Harris, S. E. 1972. A statistical portrait of Higher Education. Report to the Carnegie Commission on Higher Education. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Haven, E. W and Horch, D. H. 1972. How College Students Finance their Education. College Entrance Exam. Board, New York.

Hornig, L. S. 1987. Women graduate students: A literature review and synthesis. In Women: Their Underrepresentation and Career Differentials in Science and Engineering (ed. L. S. Dir). National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

Lefkowitz, M. R. 1979. Education for women in a man's world. Chronicle of Higher Educ. August 6, 56.

NSF (National Science Foundation). 1986. Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. U. S. Gov. Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

NSF (National Science Foundation). 1990. Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. U. S. Gov. Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Nieva, V. F and Gutek, B. A. 1980. Sex effects on evaluation. Acad. Manag. Review 5, 267-276.

Office of Technology Assessment. 1985. Demographic Trends and the Scientific and Engineering Work Force: A Technical Memorandum. U. S. Gov. Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Paludi, M. A. and Bauer, W D. 1983. Goldberg revisited: What's in an author's name. Sex Roles 9, 387-390.

Sandler, B. R. 1986. The campus climate revisited: Chilly for women faculty, administrators, and graduate students. Project on the Status and Education of Women, Association of American Colleges, Washington, D.C.

Scott, E. L. 1977. Higher Education Salary Evaluation Kit. American Assoc. Univ. Prof., Washington, D.C.

Scott, E. L. 1979. Linear models and the law: Uses and misuses in affirmative action. Proc. Amer Statist. Assoc. Social Sci. Section, 20-26.

Solomon, L. C. 1976. Male and Female Graduate Students: The question of Equal Opportunity. Praeger, New York.

Vetter, B. M. 1981. Women scientists and engineers: Trends in participation. Science 214, 1313-1321.

Vetter, B. M. 1987. Women's progress. Mosaic 18, 2-9.

Weis, L. 1985. Progress but no parity: Women in higher education. Academe 71, Nov.-Dec. 29-33.

Zuckerman, H. 1987. Persistence and change in the careers of men and women scientists and engineers: A review of current research. In Women: Their Underrepresentation and Career Differentials in Science and Engineering (ed. L. S. Dir). National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

Up: The Past, Present, and Previous: Acknowledgment